1. Great Question!
    The economic model is you.
    You did not initiate violence to gain employment, so if you did not get the job at wherever, you did not initiate violence by holding your employer hostage, till he/she gave you the job. That is Anarchy.

    All the dates and girlfriends/boyfriend and friends you have, well you did not initiate force for them to go out with you, or to sleep with you. YOU asked and they said yes, or no, but you asked. No force was used at all. That is Anarchy.

    If your Girlfriend/Boyfriend/Wife/Husband forgot to do something, let you down for whatever reason, you voice your concerns, you talk to them about how it hurt you, but you don’t initiate violence, by beating them to get your way. YOU talked to them. No force was used at all. That is Anarchy.

    The Government: A centralized coercive monopoly, which claims the right to initiate force within a given geographic area.

    Anarchy is NOT a society without RULES, you are missing, the one “R” It’s society without RULERS.

    Anarchy is everywhere, we use it everyday, we have government, to rig the game in someone’s favor. To use force, because it would be easier to force someone to give you that job, or just the money from the job, or that date, or whatever else YOU want.

     
  1. bloodyxbella reblogged this from fractalcaster
  2. rhjenkins reblogged this from paintingarevolution
  3. madthought likes this
  4. morbid-impulse likes this
  5. eveniftheshipsinks reblogged this from theveganarchist
  6. theveganarchist reblogged this from thinksquad
  7. cheg00 reblogged this from bwansen
  8. sugashane likes this
  9. takkeb likes this
  10. mogligsvamp likes this
  11. bitsymargaret reblogged this from maxlibertarios
  12. built-to-resist likes this
  13. 21pieces said: How would an anarchist react to crime? What sort of justice system would exist?
  14. nota-zombie reblogged this from paintingarevolution
  15. featheredsentinel likes this
  16. thecircuspunk reblogged this from napalmjoy
  17. prettyhysterical likes this
  18. xcallmejudasx likes this
  19. pizzavanguard reblogged this from paintingarevolution and added:
    i’m an anarchist and an aspiring mathematician, and i approve this message
  20. maxlibertarios reblogged this from napalmjoy
  21. but-an-illusion likes this
  22. napalmjoy reblogged this from paintingarevolution
  23. paintingarevolution reblogged this from thinksquad and added:
    Executed with eloquence. What brilliance.
  24. paintingarevolution likes this
  25. ihavetopeerealbad likes this
  26. elfboi reblogged this from bwansen
  27. hidingfromthenormals likes this
  28. kidcuddy likes this
  29. meeehhhhhh reblogged this from thinksquad
  30. bwansen reblogged this from thinksquad
  31. lolamunster likes this
  32. literaryphotography likes this
  33. sylphaeon likes this
  34. nyrukuthetheinrujimumorthime likes this
  35. dialectic said: So you have rules (prove it) w/o rulers (or anyone to enforce them) and, yet, somehow we’re supposed to rely on the goodness of human nature to carry us into the future safely and prosperously. You failed to answer his question: There is NO utility.
  36. amateur-anarchist likes this
  37. xcallmejudasx reblogged this from thinksquad
  38. mymindtank said: Here’s a link “Sw40speer” to a TRUE SCIENTIFICALLY VALID, EMPIRICAL, NON-PHILOSOPHICAL ECONOMIC MODEL: youtube.com/watch?v…
  39. crushmixburnrepeat reblogged this from thinksquad and added:
    YES
  40. crushmixburnrepeat likes this
  41. doctorkittyticklemonster reblogged this from thinksquad
  42. prvrtspeak likes this
  43. planetsedge likes this
  44. circulatingmind likes this
  45. themovedmind likes this
  46. tsenniche likes this
  47. humanpost said: I think there is no problem of having a government (a group of people that should facilitate the good living of the population by putting its will into practice). The only problem is greed and egoism inside the people.
  48. gagbug likes this
  49. jipc likes this
  50. ra-venous reblogged this from thinksquad